Fascinating article by Oliver Miles
Summary: Saudi Arabia shoots itself in the foot, bringing 10 women to trial for promoting lifting the ban on women driving.
The trial of ten women which began yesterday in Riyadh is a remarkable example of Saudi Arabia’s ability to commit self-harm (not an ability confined to Saudi Arabia).
The case arises from the issue of women driving, which in a different way had been another example, that one lasting over 50 years. The ban, unique to Saudi Arabia, was never convincingly justified on any grounds, Islamic law, tradition, security, even Saudi law. Arabian women have ridden and driven camels since time immemorial, and since the introduction of the motorcar herding livestock, largely women’s work, has mainly been done by car (Charles Doughty writes that “herding maidens may go alone with the flocks far out of seeing of the menzil [camp] in the empty wilderness.”) The ban was not only a crippling restriction on women but a tiresome obligation on men, since husbands and other male relatives had to spend their time driving women around. During the last 10 or even 20 years, with the Saudi government committed in theory at least to improving the position of women, criticism of the ban was heard increasingly often including (as we have noted in earlier postings) in the Saudi press. The decision to scrap the ban was almost universally welcomed, and could have been a symbol of the reforming spirit of the new regime and MBS personally.
Instead a number of activists, some of them women whose names and faces had become familiar in the media as campaigners for lifting the ban, were arrested in the weeks before the ban was actually lifted last June. Many reports say that they were ill treated or tortured (the newly released US State Department report on human rights in 2018 lists torture of prisoners as an issue in Saudi Arabia). They were not charged and reportedly had no access to lawyers, but the public prosecutor said they were suspected of harming Saudi interests and offering support to hostile elements abroad. Some Saudi media called them traitors. The case was to be heard in the Specialised Criminal Court which deals with terrorism and political offences, but was apparently transferred at the last minute to the Criminal Court. Reporters and diplomats were not admitted.
According to a report in the Saudi newspaperOkaz investigations were concluded 12 days ago. At the court hearing the accused were informed of the charges, and given time before a second hearing to consult lawyers and prepare their defence. According to a Saudi rights group in London they have been charged under a cybercrime law and could face prison sentences of 1 to 10 years.
The reports in Okaz and other Saudi newspapers are short on information such as the names of the accused, but the Saudi-based Arab News gives a bit more detail, adding that when local media said the accused were traitors and “agents of embassies”, Arab News criticized such reporting as unfair and unprofessional, and argued that the accused should be treated as innocent unless proved guilty.
Last week at least 36 countries including all 28 members of the EU (but not the US, although Mike Pompeo like Jeremy Hunt has reportedly raised this case during recent visits to Riyadh) included a call to release the activists in a joint statement at the UN Human Rights Council. Three of the U.S. congresswomen mentioned in yesterday’s digest, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Tulsi Gabbard have on various occasions called for a boycott of Saudi Arabia, criticised human rights violations, and opposed arms sales to Saudi Arabia.
The Arab News report adds that “The accused women generated a high level of publicity when they were arrested, and the opening of the trial also attracted considerable attention from international media and human right organizations.” That perhaps underestimates the importance of the case for Saudi Arabia’s image, tarnished as it currently is. At a time when women’s affairs and women’s rights are everywhere in the media, the damage this case will do goes beyond cases which are perhaps objectively more important, such as executions.
The media naturally love the fact that some at least of the accused are photogenic.
By Helena Cobban
March 13, 2019
The Gaza protests will mark their one-year anniversary on March 30. For 50 weeks, the Gaza Strip has seen thousands of residents taking part every Friday in the creative mass protests called the “Great March of Return.” Might this well-organized nonviolent action mark a new trend in Palestinian politics?
If it does, it would not be the first time that densely populated Gaza has acted as a crucible for the emergence of new political forces in Palestinian society.
When letters first showed up on Alan Leveritt’s desk saying the Arkansas Times was required to sign a pledge not to boycott Israel in order to continue to receive state contracts, he ignored them.
“I was frankly not aware there was a boycott of Israel when I started getting these notices,” Leveritt told NBC News.
As the publisher of the Arkansas Times, a monthly magazine based in Little Rock, he relies on advertisement revenue from state entities to keep his business afloat.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 7, 2019 Contact: Sonya E Meyerson-Knox | [email protected] | 929-290-0317…
March 1, 2019 Welcome to the monthly Health and Human Rights Media Watch. Members of the Health Advisory Council monitor relevant organizations and websites and compile a list of important news and issues which are summarized here. These newsletters will be posted on our website and archived as a resource. If you wish to join this effort, contact [email protected]
The Jordanian citizenry remain unwilling to pay more taxes. The old system no longer works, but the way forward demands that Jordan’s leaders address the need for substantive reforms in both the economic and political systems that currently govern Jordanian lives. Any new social contract between the ruler and ruled cannot function by raising taxes while withdrawing services to struggling lower and middle classes. Source
The firestorm that greeted newly elected Congresswoman (D-MN) Ilhan Omar’s tweets about the Israel lobby’s clout in Congress reveals as much about her critics as it does about the rising tide of progressive politicians who no longer show deference to establishment prohibitions on criticizing Israel. Having lost the moral argument about Israel’s brutal occupation of the Palestinian people, Omar’s critics pounced on the allegedly antisemitic tone of her comments rather than address her criticism of the US’s one-sided support for Israel. We asked several commentators to reflect on this largely manufactured controversy and what it tells us about the current limits of debate about Israel in the US today. Source
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 15, 2019 Contact: Sonya E Meyerson-Knox | [email protected] | 929-290-0317 Award-winning performer Harry Belafonte, civil rights icon Professor Angela Davis, playwright Eve Ensler, Nobel laureate George P. Smith and hundreds of other sign on to #IstandWithIlhanCampaign (New York City, NY) February 15, 2019: In just days, hundreds of celebrities and well-known progressive…
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 12, 2019 Contact: Sonya E Meyerson-Knox | [email protected] | 929-290-0317 When blatant antisemitic conspiracy theories were spread against George Soros, President Trump retweeted them. When antisemites carried tiki torches in Charlottesville, Donald Trump called them “very fine people.” Under Trump, well-known antisemites and white supremacists have unprecedented access…